BSTX Labs Product Strategy & Technical Discovery

Product strategy and technical leadership across client engagements

Technical consultancy where I lead product strategy and engineering across fintech, cloud infrastructure, and web development projects. Scoped a monolith-to-microservices migration that reduced deployment time 30%, built AWS/GCP data pipelines, and delivered full-stack solutions for diverse clients. This work clarified what I wanted: solving the "what should we build and why" problems upstream of engineering.


The Problem

Fintech client had a monolithic Rails application causing slow deployments and scaling issues. Mobile team was blocked needing API endpoints, but the existing architecture made changes risky.


Deeper issue: Cultural silos prevented cross-team collaboration. Teams refused to communicate, required manager approval for basic technical conversations. Legacy code had sections nobody owned or understood—zero documentation, unclear ownership, engineers scared to touch unfamiliar code.

Market gap between budget tools with limited features and expensive enterprise solutions. InsightQR targets mid-market segment with event-specific analytics unavailable elsewhere.
Market gap between budget tools with limited features and expensive enterprise solutions. InsightQR targets mid-market segment with event-specific analytics unavailable elsewhere.

Monolith vs Service Oriented vs Microservices Architecture Comparison

Strategic Approach

Applied RICE prioritization to migration scope. First target: sidebar panel with moderate reach (all users + engineers), high engineering impact (maintainability), high confidence (code refactoring).

Effort was mixed—actual code work was straightforward, but reverse engineering undocumented legacy logic was time-consuming. Previous product owners and engineers maintained zero documentation on functionality or business logic, requiring business expertise to decode and document for non-technical stakeholders.

Market gap between budget tools with limited features and expensive enterprise solutions. InsightQR targets mid-market segment with event-specific analytics unavailable elsewhere.
Market gap between budget tools with limited features and expensive enterprise solutions. InsightQR targets mid-market segment with event-specific analytics unavailable elsewhere.

RICE Prioritization: Sidebar Panel Scored Highest

Key decisions:

  • Microservices over monolith refactor (already in monolith, needed decomposition)

  • Backend-for-frontend architecture with failover to legacy monolith

  • Phased rollout section-by-section with manual QA

  • Documentation as critical deliverable—undocumented systems remain unmaintainable

What I Built

Backend-for-Frontend Architecture with Failover

Led monolith-to-microservices migration including:

  • Rails API endpoints for mobile platform

  • Backend-for-frontend architecture with automatic failover

  • Reverse-engineered and documented legacy authentication system

  • Comprehensive technical documentation for future engineers

Market gap between budget tools with limited features and expensive enterprise solutions. InsightQR targets mid-market segment with event-specific analytics unavailable elsewhere.

Deployment Time Reduction: 30% Improvement

Execution & Delivery

Released migration in chunks with failover mechanism—if new microservice endpoint failed, system automatically fell back to monolith. Tested using same user accounts, compared against legacy application, monitored post-release for failures.

Go-to-market strategy: Beachhead approach targeting Chicago commerce centers where I have existing professional relationships. Enables rapid customer discovery and product-market fit validation before scaling.

Outcomes

Technical consultancy where I lead product strategy and engineering across fintech, cloud infrastructure, and web development projects. Scoped a monolith-to-microservices migration that reduced deployment time 30%, built AWS/GCP data pipelines, and delivered full-stack solutions for diverse clients. This work clarified what I wanted: solving the "what should we build and why" problems upstream of engineering.


Year

2025

Year

2025

Year

2025

Client

Multiple client teams via BSTX Labs

Client

Multiple client teams via BSTX Labs

Client

Multiple client teams via BSTX Labs

Services

Product Strategy, Technical Product Management, Engineering Collaboration

Services

Product Strategy, Technical Product Management, Engineering Collaboration

Services

Product Strategy, Technical Product Management, Engineering Collaboration